Skip to main content

Myeloma

Oncology
5
Pipeline Programs
9
Companies
9
Clinical Trials
1
Approved Products

Pipeline by Development Stage

Preclinical
Phase 1
Phase 1/2
Phase 2
Phase 2/3
Phase 3
On Market
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
Early DiscoveryClinical DevelopmentMarket

Drug Modality Breakdown

ADC
267%
Small Molecule
133%
+ 6 programs with unclassified modality

Oncology is a $53.9B market in consolidation, dominated by a handful of megacap players with blockbuster franchises approaching patent expiration.

$53.9B marketConsolidating→ Stable30 products15 companies

Key Trends

  • Heavy patent cliff exposure (REVLIMID $3.9B LOE 2028, JAKAFI $1.9B LOE 2028)
  • Kinase inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents dominate spend; limited diversification in top 10
  • Clinical trial volume remains exceptionally high (29,145 trials) but concentration in Phase 1-2 signals early-stage pipeline challenges

Career Verdict

Strong near-term opportunity for R&D and medical affairs roles, but competitive landscape and patent cliff urgency favor specialists over generalists.

AI-generated market analysis based on FDA, CMS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and hiring data

Market Leaders

#1ELIQUISStable
$18.3B
Bristol Myers Squibb·Launch15.0yr
#2FARXIGAStable
$4.3B
AstraZeneca·Peak15.4yr
#3REVLIMIDDeclining
$3.9B
Bristol Myers Squibb·LOE Approaching1.8yr
#4XTANDIStable
$2.6B
Astellas·Peak10.7yr
#5IMBRUVICAStable
$2.4B
AbbVie·Peak8.9yr

Drug Class Breakdown

FXa Inhibitors
$18.3B(34%)

concentrated in single product

SGLT2 Inhibitors
$4.3B(8%)

single dominant product

Kinase Inhibitors
$4.0B(7%)

multi-product class, competitive

Immunomodulatory Agents (Cereblon)
$3.9B(7%)

facing near-term patent cliff

Androgen Receptor Antagonists
$2.6B(5%)

prostate cancer specialty

Protein Kinase Inhibitors
$2.4B(4%)

niche hematologic oncology

JAK Inhibitors
$1.9B(4%)

near-term LOE exposure

Career Outlook

Stable

Oncology remains a premium therapeutic area but faces structural headwinds: top 10 products account for >80% of spend, patent cliffs loom (REVLIMID 2028), and late-stage pipeline thinness suggests slower near-term growth. However, high trial volume and consolidation create demand for specialized expertise in regulatory, clinical operations, and lifecycle management. Pharma professionals with kinase inhibitor, immunomodulatory, or ADC experience are in highest demand.

Breaking In

Entry-level candidates should target CROs (Thermo Fisher, IQVIA), emerging biotech (BeiGene, BeOne), or contract manufacturing; oncology specialization requires demonstrated domain knowledge.

For Experienced Professionals

Experienced professionals should focus on lifecycle/patent strategy roles (high salary, low headcount) or pivot to emerging modalities (ADCs, bispecifics) to avoid commoditization in crowded kinase inhibitor space.

In-Demand Skills

Regulatory strategy & PDUFA navigationKinase inhibitor development (small molecule)Clinical trial operations & site managementLifecycle management & patent strategyMedical affairs (oncology-specific science)Manufacturing scale-up (small molecule & biotech)

Best For

Regulatory Affairs ManagerClinical Operations ManagerMedical Science Liaison (MSL) — OncologyLifecycle ManagerR&D Scientist (medicinal chemistry, ADME)Manufacturing Engineer

Hiring Landscape

$102K–$266K

Oncology hiring is actively concentrated at Thermo Fisher Scientific (CRO/CDMO services, 559 jobs), AstraZeneca (208 jobs), and emerging biotech players like BeiGene (185 jobs). Commercial roles dominate (412 jobs, $136K avg) but R&D positions offer the highest salary premium ($199K avg, 347 roles). Patent cliff urgency is creating acute demand for regulatory, CMC, and lifecycle management expertise.

1,946
Open Roles
5
Companies Hiring
5
Departments

Top Hiring Companies

208Stable
185Growing
167Growing
147Growing

By Department

Commercial(21%)
$136K
Research & Development(18%)
$199K
Clinical Operations(5%)
$181K
Medical Affairs(4%)
$266K
Manufacturing(5%)
$102K

Strong near-term hiring momentum, especially in CRO/CDMO and emerging biotech; Medical Affairs offers highest compensation but limited headcount.

On Market (1)

Approved therapies currently available

Otsuka
BUSULFEXApproved
busulfan
Otsuka
Alkylating Drug [EPC]injection1999

Competitive Landscape

8 companies ranked by most advanced pipeline stage

Otsuka
OtsukaJapan - Tokushima
1 program
1
1
BusulfanPhase 31 trial
Active Trials
NCT01413178Completed205Est. Mar 2019
ViiV Healthcare
ViiV HealthcareNC - Durham
1 program
1
Belantamab mafodotinPhase 2ADC
Nordic Pharma
Nordic PharmaFrance - Paris
1 program
1
CarfilzomibPhase 21 trial
Active Trials
NCT03314636Active Not Recruiting53Est. Nov 2026
Sandoz
SandozAustria - Kundl
1 program
1
PanobinostatPhase 1Small Molecule
Bristol Myers Squibb
2 programs
PomalidomidePHASE_11 trial
ClarithromycinPHASE_1_21 trial
Active Trials
NCT01807286Terminated3Est. Feb 2016
NCT02542657Active Not Recruiting30Est. Dec 2025
Daiichi Sankyo
Daiichi SankyoChina - Shanghai
1 program
DS-3032bPHASE_11 trial
Active Trials
NCT02579824Terminated14Est. Nov 2019
GSK
GSKLONDON, United Kingdom
1 program
Belantamab mafodotinPHASE_2ADC3 trials
Active Trials
NCT04680468Active Not Recruiting41Est. Jul 2026
NCT06655818Terminated4Est. Feb 2024
NCT04126200Active Not Recruiting208Est. Mar 2027
Teva
TevaIsrael - Petach Tikva
1 program
Oral CEP-701PHASE_21 trial
Active Trials
NCT00242827TerminatedEst. May 2007

Trial Timeline

Clinical trial activity over time

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
OtsukaBusulfan
GSKBelantamab mafodotin
GSKBelantamab mafodotin
Nordic PharmaCarfilzomib
TevaOral CEP-701
GSKBelantamab mafodotin
Bristol Myers SquibbClarithromycin
Daiichi SankyoDS-3032b
Bristol Myers SquibbPomalidomide

Clinical Trials (9)

Total enrollment: 558 patients across 9 trials

A Randomized Trial to Compare Busulfan + Melphalan 140 mg/m2 With Melphalan 200 mg/m2 as Preparative Regimen for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Start: Sep 2011Est. completion: Mar 2019205 patients
Phase 3Completed
NCT04680468GSKBelantamab mafodotin

Study of Belantamab Mafodotin as Pre- and Post-autologous Stem Cell Transplant and Maintenance for Multiple Myeloma

Start: Jun 2021Est. completion: Jul 202641 patients
Phase 2Active Not Recruiting
NCT04126200GSKBelantamab mafodotin

Platform Study of Belantamab Mafodotin as Monotherapy and in Combination With Anti-cancer Treatments in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Start: Oct 2019Est. completion: Mar 2027208 patients
Phase 2Active Not Recruiting

Intensified Treatment With Carfilzomib in Myeloma Patients Still PET-positive After First Line Treatment.

Start: Mar 2018Est. completion: Nov 202653 patients
Phase 2Active Not Recruiting
NCT00242827TevaOral CEP-701

Efficacy and Safety of Oral CEP-701 for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Multiple Myeloma

Start: Apr 2006Est. completion: May 2007
Phase 2Terminated
NCT06655818GSKBelantamab mafodotin

Sub-study of Belantamab Mafodotin (GSK2857916) as Monotherapy and in Combination With Dostarlimab (GSK4057190) in Participants With RRMM

Start: Mar 2021Est. completion: Feb 20244 patients
Phase 1/2Terminated

Ixazomib with Pomalidomide, Clarithromycin and Dexamethasone in Treating Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Start: Oct 2015Est. completion: Dec 202530 patients
Phase 1/2Active Not Recruiting

Ascending Dose and Exploratory Expansion Study of DS-3032b, an Oral MDM2 Inhibitor, in Subjects With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Start: Aug 2016Est. completion: Nov 201914 patients
Phase 1Terminated

Pomalidomide With Melphalan and Dexamethasone for Untreated Systemic AL Amyloidosis

Start: Jan 2014Est. completion: Feb 20163 patients
Phase 1Terminated

Related Jobs in Oncology

Phase Legend

PreclinicalLab & animal studies
Phase 1Safety & dosing
Phase 2Efficacy testing
Phase 3Large-scale trials
On MarketApproved & available

Key Insights

1 late-stage (Phase 3) programs, potential near-term approvals
9 companies competing in this space

The information on this page is for informational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice. Drug information is sourced from FDA, DailyMed, and other government databases. Adverse event data from FAERS does not establish causation. Always consult a healthcare professional for medical decisions.