Skip to main content

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse

Oncology
6
Pipeline Programs
11
Companies
8
Clinical Trials
1 recruiting
0
Approved Products

Pipeline by Development Stage

Preclinical
Phase 1
Phase 1/2
Phase 2
Phase 2/3
Phase 3
On Market
0
1
0
5
0
0
0
Early DiscoveryClinical DevelopmentMarket

Drug Modality Breakdown

ADC
375%
Monoclonal Antibody
125%
+ 9 programs with unclassified modality

Oncology is a $53.9B market in consolidation, dominated by a handful of megacap players with blockbuster franchises approaching patent expiration.

$53.9B marketConsolidating→ Stable30 products15 companies

Key Trends

  • Heavy patent cliff exposure (REVLIMID $3.9B LOE 2028, JAKAFI $1.9B LOE 2028)
  • Kinase inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents dominate spend; limited diversification in top 10
  • Clinical trial volume remains exceptionally high (29,145 trials) but concentration in Phase 1-2 signals early-stage pipeline challenges

Career Verdict

Strong near-term opportunity for R&D and medical affairs roles, but competitive landscape and patent cliff urgency favor specialists over generalists.

AI-generated market analysis based on FDA, CMS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and hiring data

Market Leaders

#1ELIQUISStable
$18.3B
Bristol Myers Squibb·Launch15.0yr
#2FARXIGAStable
$4.3B
AstraZeneca·Peak15.4yr
#3REVLIMIDDeclining
$3.9B
Bristol Myers Squibb·LOE Approaching1.8yr
#4XTANDIStable
$2.6B
Astellas·Peak10.7yr
#5IMBRUVICAStable
$2.4B
AbbVie·Peak8.9yr

Drug Class Breakdown

FXa Inhibitors
$18.3B(34%)

concentrated in single product

SGLT2 Inhibitors
$4.3B(8%)

single dominant product

Kinase Inhibitors
$4.0B(7%)

multi-product class, competitive

Immunomodulatory Agents (Cereblon)
$3.9B(7%)

facing near-term patent cliff

Androgen Receptor Antagonists
$2.6B(5%)

prostate cancer specialty

Protein Kinase Inhibitors
$2.4B(4%)

niche hematologic oncology

JAK Inhibitors
$1.9B(4%)

near-term LOE exposure

Career Outlook

Stable

Oncology remains a premium therapeutic area but faces structural headwinds: top 10 products account for >80% of spend, patent cliffs loom (REVLIMID 2028), and late-stage pipeline thinness suggests slower near-term growth. However, high trial volume and consolidation create demand for specialized expertise in regulatory, clinical operations, and lifecycle management. Pharma professionals with kinase inhibitor, immunomodulatory, or ADC experience are in highest demand.

Breaking In

Entry-level candidates should target CROs (Thermo Fisher, IQVIA), emerging biotech (BeiGene, BeOne), or contract manufacturing; oncology specialization requires demonstrated domain knowledge.

For Experienced Professionals

Experienced professionals should focus on lifecycle/patent strategy roles (high salary, low headcount) or pivot to emerging modalities (ADCs, bispecifics) to avoid commoditization in crowded kinase inhibitor space.

In-Demand Skills

Regulatory strategy & PDUFA navigationKinase inhibitor development (small molecule)Clinical trial operations & site managementLifecycle management & patent strategyMedical affairs (oncology-specific science)Manufacturing scale-up (small molecule & biotech)

Best For

Regulatory Affairs ManagerClinical Operations ManagerMedical Science Liaison (MSL) — OncologyLifecycle ManagerR&D Scientist (medicinal chemistry, ADME)Manufacturing Engineer

Hiring Landscape

$102K–$266K

Oncology hiring is actively concentrated at Thermo Fisher Scientific (CRO/CDMO services, 559 jobs), AstraZeneca (208 jobs), and emerging biotech players like BeiGene (185 jobs). Commercial roles dominate (412 jobs, $136K avg) but R&D positions offer the highest salary premium ($199K avg, 347 roles). Patent cliff urgency is creating acute demand for regulatory, CMC, and lifecycle management expertise.

1,946
Open Roles
5
Companies Hiring
5
Departments

Top Hiring Companies

208Stable
185Growing
167Growing
147Growing

By Department

Commercial(21%)
$136K
Research & Development(18%)
$199K
Clinical Operations(5%)
$181K
Medical Affairs(4%)
$266K
Manufacturing(5%)
$102K

Strong near-term hiring momentum, especially in CRO/CDMO and emerging biotech; Medical Affairs offers highest compensation but limited headcount.

Competitive Landscape

11 companies ranked by most advanced pipeline stage

Pfizer
PfizerNEW YORK, NY
3 programs
1
2
SGN-40Phase 2
SGN-40Phase 2
SGN-40Phase 1
Nordic Pharma
Nordic PharmaFrance - Paris
1 program
1
R-CHOEPPhase 21 trial
Active Trials
NCT03293173Active Not Recruiting120Est. Dec 2024
MSD
MSDIreland - Ballydine
1 program
1
Zilovertamab vedotinPhase 2ADC1 trial
Active Trials
NCT06890884Recruiting594Est. Dec 2032
Sharp Therapeutics
Sharp TherapeuticsPA - Pittsburgh
1 program
1
Zilovertamab vedotinPhase 2ADC
Novartis
NovartisBASEL, Switzerland
1 program
Digital Health CoachingN/A
Sandoz
SandozAustria - Kundl
1 program
Digital Health CoachingN/A1 trial
Active Trials
NCT05199961Terminated4Est. Sep 2022
ETS
ETSMO - Rolla
1 program
Prospective Data Collection of Elderly Patients With DLBCL Receiving at the Time of Diagnosis VGMN/A1 trial
Active Trials
NCT02364050Unknown1,300Est. Dec 2020
Boehringer Ingelheim
Boehringer IngelheimINGELHEIM, Germany
1 program
BI 836826PHASE_21 trial
Active Trials
NCT02624492Completed21Est. Mar 2018
Bristol Myers Squibb
1 program
DurvalumabPHASE_2Monoclonal Antibody1 trial
Active Trials
NCT03241017Withdrawn0Est. Dec 2021
Roche
RocheSTAVANGER NORWAY, Norway
1 program
Rituximab IVPHASE_2
Merck & Co.
Merck & Co.RAHWAY, NJ
1 program
Zilovertamab vedotinPHASE_2ADC2 trials
Active Trials
NCT04504916Terminated102Est. Jun 2023
NCT03833180Completed91Est. Dec 2023

Trial Timeline

Clinical trial activity over time

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
MSDZilovertamab vedotin
Merck & Co.Zilovertamab vedotin
Bristol Myers SquibbDurvalumab
Nordic PharmaR-CHOEP
Boehringer IngelheimBI 836826
Merck & Co.Zilovertamab vedotin
SandozDigital Health Coaching
ETSProspective Data Collection of Elderly Patients With DLBCL Receiving at the Time of Diagnosis VGM

Clinical Trials (8)

Total enrollment: 2,232 patients across 8 trials

NCT06890884MSDZilovertamab vedotin

A Clinical Study of Zilovertamab Vedotin (MK-2140) Plus Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Prednisone (R-CHP) Versus Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus R-CHP in People With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) (MK-2140-011/waveLINE-011)

Start: Apr 2025Est. completion: Dec 2032594 patients
Phase 2Recruiting
NCT04504916Merck & Co.Zilovertamab vedotin

A Study of Zilovertamab Vedotin (MK-2140/VLS-101) in Participants With Solid Tumors (MK-2140-002)

Start: Oct 2020Est. completion: Jun 2023102 patients
Phase 2Terminated

Durvalumab in DLBCL After Autologous Transplant

Start: Oct 2017Est. completion: Dec 20210
Phase 2Withdrawn

Biomarker Driven Intensified ChemoImmunotherapy With Early CNS Prophylaxis

Start: Aug 2017Est. completion: Dec 2024120 patients
Phase 2Active Not Recruiting

To Determine the Dose of BI 836826-GemOx and the Efficacy of BI 836826-GemOx Versus R-GemOx in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL

Start: Jan 2016Est. completion: Mar 201821 patients
Phase 2Completed
NCT03833180Merck & Co.Zilovertamab vedotin

A Study of Zilovertamab Vedotin (MK-2140) (VLS-101) in Participants With Hematologic Malignancies (MK-2140-001)

Start: Mar 2019Est. completion: Dec 202391 patients
Phase 1Completed
NCT05199961SandozDigital Health Coaching

Quality of Life of Adults With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Treated With Tisagenlecleucel

Start: Jan 2022Est. completion: Sep 20224 patients
N/ATerminated
NCT02364050ETSProspective Data Collection of Elderly Patients With DLBCL Receiving at the Time of Diagnosis VGM

Prospective Data Collection of Elderly Patients With DLBCL Receiving at the Time of Diagnosis VGM

Start: Sep 2013Est. completion: Dec 20201,300 patients
N/AUnknown

Related Jobs in Oncology

Phase Legend

PreclinicalLab & animal studies
Phase 1Safety & dosing
Phase 2Efficacy testing
Phase 3Large-scale trials
On MarketApproved & available

Key Insights

1 actively recruiting trials targeting 2,232 patients
11 companies competing in this space

The information on this page is for informational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice. Drug information is sourced from FDA, DailyMed, and other government databases. Adverse event data from FAERS does not establish causation. Always consult a healthcare professional for medical decisions.