Skip to main content

Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis

Respiratory
3
Pipeline Programs
5
Companies
3
Clinical Trials
0
Approved Products

Pipeline by Development Stage

Preclinical
Phase 1
Phase 1/2
Phase 2
Phase 2/3
Phase 3
On Market
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
Early DiscoveryClinical DevelopmentMarket

Drug Modality Breakdown

Monoclonal Antibody
1100%
+ 4 programs with unclassified modality

Respiratory is a $39.4B mature market dominated by established inhalers and combination therapies with significant patent cliff risk.

$39.4B marketMature→ Stable30 products15 companies

Key Trends

  • Consolidation around GSK's triple-therapy franchises (Trelegy, Breo, Anoro)
  • Major patent expirations 2026-2031 creating $7.8B revenue cliff
  • High clinical trial activity (4,862 trials) suggesting pipeline innovation despite market maturity

Career Verdict

Respiratory offers stable commercial careers but limited growth upside; best for professionals seeking established markets with strong commercial infrastructure rather than innovation-driven advancement.

AI-generated market analysis based on FDA, CMS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and hiring data

Market Leaders

#1ELIQUISGrowing
$18.3B
Bristol Myers Squibb·Launch15.0yr
#3TRELEGY ELLIPTADeclining
$4.5B
GSK·Peak4.9yr
#4CREONDeclining
$1.5B
AbbVie·Approaching LOE
#5BREO ELLIPTADeclining
$1.4B
GSK·Peak4.9yr

Drug Class Breakdown

FXa Inhibitors
$18.3B(46%)

dominant market driver

Unknown/Undisclosed Mechanism
$9.7B(25%)

fragmented portfolio

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
$7.4B(19%)

rapidly expanding

Pancreatic Enzymes
$1.5B(4%)

legacy product

Corticosteroid/LABA Combinations
$796M(2%)

patent cliff approaching

Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists
$456M(1%)

mature maintenance therapy

Career Outlook

Stable

Respiratory is a stable, mature market suitable for commercial and medical affairs professionals seeking established career paths, but offers limited growth or innovation-focused opportunities. The impending patent cliff ($7.8B+ revenue at risk 2026-2031) will drive near-term restructuring and consolidation, potentially reducing headcount in 2027-2028. Professionals should expect strong compensation in Medical Affairs and field roles but limited advancement into strategic or R&D positions.

Breaking In

New graduates should prioritize commercial, field-based, or Medical Affairs roles over R&D; respiratory offers structured training and stable compensation but limited innovation exposure, so pair this experience with cross-therapeutic skill-building for long-term mobility.

For Experienced Professionals

Experienced professionals should evaluate whether to maximize earnings in this mature, stable market or transition to higher-growth areas (oncology, cell therapy); respiratory consolidation 2027-2030 will reduce senior-level opportunities, so consider strategic moves before patent cliff impacts headcount.

In-Demand Skills

Commercial execution and territory managementMedical Affairs/Key Opinion Leader engagementRegulatory affairs and lifecycle managementInhalation device expertise and product trainingManaged care and payer negotiations

Best For

Brand ManagerMedical Science LiaisonRegional Sales ManagerField Medical RepresentativePayer Relations ManagerRegulatory Specialist

Hiring Landscape

$84K-$314K

The respiratory sector shows modest hiring momentum (510 jobs across tracked positions) concentrated in commercial and engineering roles, with AstraZeneca and GSK leading. Medical Affairs positions command premium salaries ($314K avg) but represent only 3% of openings, reflecting the mature market's focus on sales execution over innovation. Hiring velocity is moderate and reflects market consolidation rather than expansion, suggesting limited career progression opportunities for early-to-mid career professionals.

510
Open Roles
5
Companies Hiring
5
Departments

Top Hiring Companies

43Stable
70Growing
45Stable
15Stable

By Department

Commercial(23%)
$122K
Engineering(11%)
$111K
Medical Affairs(3%)
$314K
IT(4%)
$84K
Manufacturing(3%)

Respiratory hiring favors commercial and field-based roles over R&D; Medical Affairs roles offer premium compensation but are scarce, making this area competitive for specialized talent.

Competitive Landscape

5 companies ranked by most advanced pipeline stage

Cipla
CiplaIndia - Mumbai
1 program
1
PrednisolonePhase 2/31 trial
Active Trials
NCT01621321Completed50Est. Apr 2016
Cipla USA
Cipla USANJ - Warren
1 program
1
PrednisolonePhase 2/3
Zambon
ZambonItaly - Bresso
1 program
1
Voriconazole inhaledPhase 11 trial
Active Trials
NCT04229303Completed58Est. Aug 2020
UNION therapeutics
UNION therapeuticsDenmark - Hellerup
1 program
Multicenter Registration Study on Allergic Bronchopulmonary AspergillosisN/A1 trial
Active Trials
NCT06645210Not Yet Recruiting300Est. Jan 2026
Regeneron
RegeneronTARRYTOWN, NY
1 program
dupilumabPHASE_2Monoclonal Antibody

Trial Timeline

Clinical trial activity over time

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
CiplaPrednisolone
ZambonVoriconazole inhaled
UNION therapeuticsMulticenter Registration Study on Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis

Clinical Trials (3)

Total enrollment: 408 patients across 3 trials

NCT01621321CiplaPrednisolone

Voriconazole Versus Oral Steroids in Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis

Start: Jun 2013Est. completion: Apr 201650 patients
Phase 2/3Completed
NCT04229303ZambonVoriconazole inhaled

Phase 1 Three Part SAD, MAD & Cross-Over Study of ZP-059 in Healthy and Asthmatic Subjects

Start: Feb 2020Est. completion: Aug 202058 patients
Phase 1Completed
NCT06645210UNION therapeuticsMulticenter Registration Study on Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis

Multicenter Registration Study on Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis

Start: Oct 2024Est. completion: Jan 2026300 patients
N/ANot Yet Recruiting

Related Jobs in Respiratory

Phase Legend

PreclinicalLab & animal studies
Phase 1Safety & dosing
Phase 2Efficacy testing
Phase 3Large-scale trials
On MarketApproved & available

Key Insights

5 companies competing in this space

The information on this page is for informational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice. Drug information is sourced from FDA, DailyMed, and other government databases. Adverse event data from FAERS does not establish causation. Always consult a healthcare professional for medical decisions.