Skip to main content

Inherited Retinal Dystrophy Due to RPE65 Mutations

Ophthalmology
1
Pipeline Programs
1
Companies
2
Clinical Trials
0
Approved Products

Pipeline by Development Stage

Preclinical
Phase 1
Phase 1/2
Phase 2
Phase 2/3
Phase 3
On Market
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Early DiscoveryClinical DevelopmentMarket

Drug Modality Breakdown

Gene Therapy
1100%
+ 1 programs with unclassified modality

Ophthalmology is a $3.7B market with a mature, consolidating portfolio dominated by glaucoma treatments and emerging corneal/retinal therapies.

$3.7B marketMature→ Stable30 products15 companies

Key Trends

  • Glaucoma therapeutics (prostaglandin analogs, adrenergic agents) represent 60%+ of spending but face patent cliffs 2028-2034
  • Innovative mechanisms (NGF agonists, LFA-1 antagonists, RTKIs) gaining traction in dry eye and retinal disease segments
  • Heavy trial activity (2,656 total) skewed toward Phase 4 (369) and Phase 3 (442), indicating mature clinical development landscape

Career Verdict

Ophthalmology offers stable mid-career opportunities with strong Commercial and Medical Affairs salaries, but limited innovation catalysts and significant patent cliff risk warrant careful timing of entry.

AI-generated market analysis based on FDA, CMS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and hiring data

Market Leaders

#1LUMIGANDeclining
$697M
AbbVie·LOE_APPROACHING
#2OXERVATEStable
$493M
Unspecified·PEAK
#3XIIDRAStable
$473M
Bausch + Lomb·PEAK7.6yr
#4INLYTAGrowing
$467M
Pfizer·PEAK11.2yr
#5HUMIRADeclining
$258M
AbbVie·LOE_APPROACHING

Drug Class Breakdown

Prostaglandin Analogs (Bimatoprost)
$697M(19%)

mature, losing exclusivity

Nerve Growth Factor Agonists
$493M(13%)

peak growth in corneal disease

LFA-1 Antagonists (Dry Eye)
$473M(13%)

sustained peak sales

Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
$467M(13%)

expanding in retinal indications

Alpha-2 Adrenergic Agonists
$362M(10%)

mature, multiple LOE approaching

Combination Therapies (Brimonidine/Timolol)
$232M(6%)

mature, losing exclusivity

Complement Inhibitors
$223M(6%)

mature immunology approach

Career Outlook

Stable

Ophthalmology offers predictable mid-career growth with strong Commercial ($158K) and Medical Affairs ($247K) compensation but faces structural headwinds: patent cliffs 2028-2034 eliminate $97M in revenue, glaucoma franchise maturity limits blockbuster potential, and modest trial volume (2,656) signals incremental R&D expansion. Best suited for professionals seeking stable roles in established therapeutic areas rather than disruptive innovation.

Breaking In

Enter via Clinical Operations or Commercial analyst roles at CROs (Syneos 210 jobs) or large diagnostics players (Labcorp 904) to build domain expertise before targeting pharma MSL/Medical Affairs positions.

For Experienced Professionals

Experienced professionals should prioritize Medical Affairs and Market Access roles leveraging mature market knowledge; avoid product-specific expertise in glaucoma due to patent cliff concentration, and consider adjacent areas (retinal, corneal) where innovation catalysts remain.

In-Demand Skills

Glaucoma/dry eye clinical expertise and key opinion leader relationshipsRegulatory navigation for mature small-molecule formulations and device combinationsMarket access and reimbursement strategy (high generic/biosimilar pressure)

Best For

Medical Science Liaison (MSL) — strong $247K average salary, KOL interface criticalCommercial/Brand Manager — competitive $158K salaries, established product lifecycle managementClinical Operations Manager — high hiring volume (409 jobs), trial coordination in Phase 4-heavy pipeline

Hiring Landscape

$59K-$247K

Ophthalmology hiring (3,202 jobs) is distributed across diagnostics/devices (Labcorp 904, Abbott 348) and pharma commercial functions rather than concentrated in R&D. Top pharmaceutical employers (Pfizer 60, AstraZeneca 100, Regeneron 168) show modest pharma-specific headcount relative to market size, suggesting outsourced CRO and distributor dependency. Medical Affairs ($247K avg salary) commands premium compensation, signaling high barrier to entry but strong mid-career upside.

3,202
Open Roles
5
Companies Hiring
5
Departments

Top Hiring Companies

904Growing
348Stable
168Growing
219Stable

By Department

Clinical Operations(13%)
$150K
Commercial(10%)
$158K
Medical Affairs(3%)
$247K
R&D(6%)
$145K
Engineering(9%)
$112K

Clinical Operations and Commercial roles offer entry-level stability ($150K-$158K); Medical Affairs commands premium salaries ($247K) but requires advanced credentials; limited R&D hiring (207 jobs) suggests constrained innovation investment.

Competitive Landscape

1 companies ranked by most advanced pipeline stage

SPARK Biopharma
SPARK BiopharmaKorea - Seoul
2 programs
1
AAV2-hRPE65v2,voretigene neparvovec-rzylPhase 3Gene Therapy1 trial
AAV2-hRPE65v2N/A1 trial
Active Trials
NCT03602820Active Not Recruiting41Est. Jan 2030
NCT00999609Active Not Recruiting31Est. Jan 2030

Trial Timeline

Clinical trial activity over time

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
SPARK BiopharmaAAV2-hRPE65v2,voretigene neparvovec-rzyl
SPARK BiopharmaAAV2-hRPE65v2

Clinical Trials (2)

Total enrollment: 72 patients across 2 trials

NCT00999609SPARK BiopharmaAAV2-hRPE65v2,voretigene neparvovec-rzyl

Safety and Efficacy Study in Subjects With Leber Congenital Amaurosis

Start: Oct 2012Est. completion: Jan 203031 patients
Phase 3Active Not Recruiting

Long-term Follow-up Study in Subjects Who Received Voretigene Neparvovec-rzyl (AAV2-hRPE65v2)

Start: Jun 2015Est. completion: Jan 203041 patients
N/AActive Not Recruiting

Related Jobs in Ophthalmology

Phase Legend

PreclinicalLab & animal studies
Phase 1Safety & dosing
Phase 2Efficacy testing
Phase 3Large-scale trials
On MarketApproved & available

Key Insights

1 late-stage (Phase 3) programs, potential near-term approvals
1 companies competing in this space

The information on this page is for informational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice. Drug information is sourced from FDA, DailyMed, and other government databases. Adverse event data from FAERS does not establish causation. Always consult a healthcare professional for medical decisions.